12.1.1 Inputs to Procurement Planning

.1 Scope statement. The scope statement (see Section 5.2.3.1) describes the current project boundaries. It provides important information about project needs and strategies that must be considered during procurement planning.

.2 Product description. The description of the product of the project (described in Section 5.1.1.1) provides important information about any technical issues or concerns that would need to be considered during procurement planning.
  The product description is generally broader than a statement of work. A product description describes the ultimate end-product of the project; a statement of work (discussed in Section 12.1.3.2) describes the portion of that product to be provided by a seller to the project. However, if the performing organization chooses to procure the entire product, then the distinction between the two terms disappears.

.3 Procurement resources. If the performing organization does not have a formal contracting group, then the project team will have to supply both the resources and the expertise to support project procurement activities.

.4 Market conditions. The procurement planning process must consider what products and services are available in the marketplace, from whom, and under what terms and conditions.

.5 Other planning outputs. To the extent that other planning outputs are available, they must be considered during procurement planning. Other planning outputs that must often be considered include preliminary cost and schedule estimates, quality management plans, cash-flow projections, the work breakdown structure, identified risks, and planned staffing.

.6 Constrains. Constraints are factors that limit the buyer’s options. One of the most common constraints for many projects is funds availability.

.7 Assumptions. Assumptions are factors that, for planning purposes, will be considered to be true, real, or certain.

12.1.2 Tools and Techniques for Procurement Planning

.1 Make-or-buy analysis. This is a general management technique and a part of the initial scope definition process that can be used to determine whether a particular product can be produced cost effectively by the performing organization. Analysis should include both indirect as well as direct costs. For example, the “buy” side of the analysis should include both the actual out-of-pocket cost to purchase the product as well as the indirect costs of managing the purchasing process.
  A make-or-buy analysis must also reflect the perspective of the performing organization as well as the immediate needs of the project. For example, purchasing a capital item (anything from a construction crane to a personal computer) rather than renting or leasing it may or may not be cost effective. However, if the performing organization has an ongoing need for the item, the portion of the purchase cost allocated to the project may be less than the cost of the rental.

.2 Expert judgment. Expert technical judgment will often be required to assess the inputs to this process. Such expertise may be provided by any group or individual with specialized knowledge or training and is available from many sources including:

   Other units within the performing organization.

   Consultants.

   Professional and technical associations.

   Industry groups.

.3 Contract type selection. Different types of contracts are more or less appropriate for different types of purchases. Contracts generally fall into one of three broad categories:

   Fixed price or lump-sum contracts—this category of contract involves a fixed total price for a well-defined product. To the extent that the product is not well-defined, both the buyer and seller are at risk—the buyer may not receive the desired product or the seller may need to incur additional costs to provide it. Fixed-price contracts may also include incentives for meeting or exceeding selected project objectives such as schedule targets.

   Cost-reimbursable contracts—this category of contract involves payment (reimbursement) to the seller for its actual costs plus typically a fee representing seller profit. Costs are usually classified as direct costs or indirect costs. Direct costs are costs incurred for the exclusive benefit of the project (e.g., salaries of full-time project staff). Indirect costs, also called overhead costs, are costs allocated to the project by the performing organization as a cost of doing business (e.g., salaries of corporate executives). Indirect costs are usually calculated as a percentage of direct costs. Cost reimbursable contracts often include incentives for meeting or exceeding selected project objectives such as schedule targets or total cost.

   Time and Material (T&M) contracts—T&M contracts are a hybrid type of contractual arrangement that contains aspects of both cost-reimbursable and fixed-price-type arrangements. T&M contracts resemble cost-type arrangements in that they are open ended, because the full value of the arrangement is not defined at the time of the award. Thus, T&M contracts can grow in contract value as if they were cost-reimbursable-type arrangements. Conversely, T&M arrangements can also resemble fixed-unit arrangements when, for example, the unit rates are preset by the buyer and seller, as when both parties agree on the rates for the category of "senior engineers".

12.1.3 Outputs from Procurement Planning

.1 Procurement management plan. The procurement management plan should describe how the remaining procurement processes (from solicitation planning through contract closeout) will be managed. For example:

   What types of contracts will be used?

   If independent estimates will be needed as evaluation criteria, who will prepare them and when?

   If the performing organization has a procurement department, what actions can the project management team take on its own?

   If standardized procurement documents are needed, where can they be found?

   How will multiple providers be managed?

   How will procurement be coordinated with other project aspects, such as scheduling and performance reporting?

  A procurement management plan may be formal or informal, highly detailed or broadly framed, based on the needs of the project. It is a subsidiary element of the project plan described in Section 4.1, Project Plan Development.

.2 Statement(s) of work. The statement of work (SOW) describes the procurement item in sufficient detail to allow prospective sellers to determine if they are capable of providing the item. “Sufficient detail” may vary, based on the nature of the item, the needs of the buyer, or the expected contract form.
  Some application areas recognize different types of SOW. For example, in some government jurisdictions, the term SOW is reserved for a procurement item that is a clearly specified product or service, and the term Statement of Requirements (SOR) is used for a procurement item that is presented as a problem to be solved.
  The statement of work may be revised and refined as it moves through the procurement process. For example, a prospective seller may suggest a more efficient approach or a less costly product than that originally specified. Each individual procurement item requires a separate statement of work. However, multiple products or services may be grouped as one procurement item with a single SOW.
  The statement of work should be as clear, as complete, and as concise as possible. It should include a description of any collateral services required, such as performance reporting or postproject operational support for the procured item. In some application areas, there are specific content and format requirements for a SOW.